Water is (almost) free in BC, even during droughts.

When the public pays for water, whether it’s gushing from taps or into toilet bowls, the price covers infrastructure required to get that water wherever it’s going, not the water itself. A similar rule applies to companies that extract water to bottle and sell: they pay to use the water, they don’t purchase it. And they don’t pay very much.

The NDP criticized the scheme when the system was proposed seven years ago. It didn’t change the rules after it took office in 2017. But the water-for-free scheme might be changing soon.

Drought rules

As a severe drought has set in across British Columbia with rivers running at record-low levels, concerns around water conservation and reservoir levels have bubbled back up to the surface.

Earlier this month, provincial Emergency Preparedness Minister Bowinn Ma told the public that everyone will need to pitch in, from municipalities to individuals to companies

“We are experiencing a serious drought which may worsen into the fall and summer or even into the next year,” she said. “We are calling on everyone in BC, including residential and industrial water users, to reduce their water usage. Everyone needs to do their part.”

Even though local reservoirs might be at healthy levels at the moment, she continued, they may not recharge normally if drought conditions continue beyond the summer.

Commercial extraction companies have also been asked to reduce the amount of water they use as well, and stricter regulations will be enforced if required, Ma said in response to a question by The Current.

The way commercial water bottling companies use Canadian water has long garnered attention across the country. In BC, the spotlight often lands on the Kawkawa aquifer, which covers 6.3 square kilometres underneath the town of Hope. It’s an unconfined aquifer, which means part of it is open to the air (Kawkawa Lake) and is refilled directly with rain and snowmelt. Water runs and pools below the surface in channels carved through fractured crystalline rock.

BlueTriton Brands (formerly Nestlé) bottles water from the aquifer at a facility just east of Kawkawa Lake. A spokesperson for the company said it would comply with “science-based” restrictions, and that its extraction activity takes less than one percent of the aquifer’s available water. The spokesperson said the company also provides (and donates some) bottled water, which it says is an important resource for communities elsewhere facing shortages or evacuation orders from wildfires—another effect of a dry summer.

“We share Minister Ma’s concern about sustainable water supply for the public and will abide by science-based restrictions the government may require,” they said.

Restrictions on water bottling companies during a drought aim to save water in the short term. But longer-term changes to conserve water used commercially were suggested several years ago, and have not materialized.

A price on water

Commercial water extraction in BC is governed by a water licensing system that took effect with the Water Sustainability Act in 2016. A company with a licence pays a commercial water “rental” rate of $2.25 for every one million litres it uses. The rate isn’t tied to inflation, and hasn’t increased since it was set in 2016 even as the amount the companies charge for water has risen.

For each one-litre bottle of Hope water BlueTriton sells, it pays approximately two ten-thousandth of a cent to BC taxpayers.

When the current rate was proposed in 2015 then-NDP environment critic Spencer Chandra-Herbert (now deputy speaker) said the rate was too low.

The Liberal government at the time determined what was an acceptable rate, Chandra-Hebert said. "They think that $2.25 is a good value for a million litres. It doesn't seem quite right to me.” Instead of renting the water or charging for access, he suggested that water should be valued more like the precious resource it is—and like the consumer good it becomes after it’s packaged.

"If you're going to turn around and make millions through the sale of it, we need to put a price on it so we can pile that money back into conserving water," Chandra-Hebert said.

New plans, no answers

Eight years after Chandra-Hebert’s comments, and six years after the NDP took power, the water rental rate remains unchanged.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Forests said that the province recognizes public concern about the future of freshwater, but did not answer whether the government was explicitly considering changing the way commercial water extraction works in BC.

The government is developing a new Watershed Security Strategy that will determine how different watersheds in the province are governed. It is expected to encourage new approaches to water conservation “at all scales and across all users,” a spokesperson for the Ministry of Water, Land, and Resource Stewardship, which is handling the strategy, said.

It might impact the water rental rate, and it might propose changes to the way the licensing works.

“Legislative change in this regard and more broadly may also be one outcome of the final strategy,” the spokesperson said.

Public engagement on the strategy concluded last spring. Indigenous consultation will continue into the fall. The strategy is scheduled to be introduced next winter.

❝

Our readers' support means tens of thousands of locals in the Fraser Valley can continue getting local news, and in-depth, award-winning reporting. We can't do it without you. Whether you give monthly or annually, your help will power our local reporting for years to come. With enough support, we’ll be able to hire more journalists and produce even more great stories about your community.

But we aren’t there yet. Support us for as low at $1.62 per week, and rest assured you’re doing your part to help inform your community.

- Tyler, Joti, and Grace.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Claudia Peters, Maple Ridge2 years ago

I think bottled water use should be restricted to emergency use only. People (including government workers) are so gullible to commercial propaganda: our tap water is monitored and excellent quality. Bottled water is polluted with microplastics and not monitored. Why aren't the bottles "compostable" now?

Avatar

Norm Lewis2 years ago

Why people drink bottled water to begin with is beyond me. We have some of the best tap water in the world.

Avatar

Margaret Holford2 years ago

Restrictions on water extracting companies should come sooner rather than later and public awareness and activism should hold governments ‘feet to the fire’ !!! Our water should not be depleted/sold to companies making huge profits without significant compensation to our province . Such a valuable resource should not be sold at a pittance it would appear this matter is not one of priority ??

Avatar

Nicole Martin2 years ago

This is a resource for Canadian people. Not for large corporations. If they want to get water they should purchase a highly specialized purifying machine that turns sea water into drinking water. Then sell that. They should also be made to provide that fresh water for impoverished people. It is garbage how our natural resources are being robbed from beneath our feet.

Avatar

Michele Martin3 years ago

Water should not be sold to any companies to bottle. It should be used by Canadians.

Avatar

Libby Bucar3 years ago

I'm wondering if this will eventually impact condo owners who typically have free water incl in the fees.?

Avatar

Farmer Kathy3 years ago

Water bottling companies produce plastic bottles, that is the product.

Avatar

Irene Hill3 years ago

I’m pretty sure that I read something by Maud Barlow years ago - that if anywhere in Canada started charging US companies for water - it changes agreements between Canada and the US, and we would lose the ability to say - no, you can’t have that water about any fresh water in Canada. I could be wrong about this - but it might be worth checking out.

Avatar

Edna Clifford3 years ago

We have a small cabin near Kawkawa Lake that is not used much. We pay almost 700$ for water and garbage pick up. The water levels in the area are dropping. Usually our yard is quite damp even in the summer. Not so anymore. The rates that are charged to the bottling companies are ridiculous and will have tragic consequences for the future of our water. I’m not sure why it is called water rental as they are not using it temporarily and it will not be there when they have drained it all. They also should be charged a tax on all of the plastic bottles they send into Our environment. The company statement that they supply some free bottled water to fire evacuated people is ludicrous. This does not in any way even up the literal drain on what they take. NDP should do better in charging a realistic rate if they are going to allow these multinational companies to drain our aquifers. In the best case scenario they would stop selling water altogether.

Avatar

John Glena3 years ago

wow, great story. I was not aware that Kawkawa Lake supplied water to a bottling plant. What is with the $2.25 RENTAL of the water for bottling. Rates need to change and reflect the true value of the water.

Avatar

Lin James3 years ago

At the present time water bottling companies are still enjoying very cheap access to water supply. Why has the price to consumers, specifically the 18.9 L bottles, more than doubled in the past 6 months? It cannot all be explained away by fuel and payroll cost increases.

Avatar

Irene Venema3 years ago

Thank you for this information. With water becoming a more recognized, precious commodity a higher monetary value should reasonably be expected from bottling companies.