Fort Langley is not all that old. 

The town itself has a long history as an early settlement on the Fraser River but many of the shops that line Glover Road selling jewelry, coffee, crystals, books or novelty mason jars aren’t actually old buildings. Instead, they were built in a particular style, largely since the 1960s—classic, vaguely-european, and old-looking—to preserve the town’s heritage theme.

What the town’s stylized heritage ought to look like, though, is a continuing debate—one that a new development on Glover Road is about to change forever.

A new building is planned for the heart of Fort Langley. Two shops next to the rainbow crosswalk and 50s diner on Glover Road are slated for demolition. In their place, A developer will build a sleek, glassy two-storey building in a more modern style than the surrounding shops. The building will have apartments on the upper floors and retail space on the bottom. In plans for the construction submitted to council, the building is simply labeled as “Cool Small Building.” 

Concept plans for the “Cool Small Building.” 📷 Langley City.

Last month, Langley Township Council approved a heritage alteration permit, one of the steps required before a building permit can be issued for the location. 

But council was split over what Fort Langley should look like and how best to display the town’s heritage through the style of the buildings. While some said the heritage style should be maintained and buildings should match, other councilors maintained that more modern styles would contrast well with the rest of the street.

Upgrade Now

Get access to premium content

Subscribe

Subscription benefits:

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Michelle Jones2 years ago

Please don't tell me this was approved.

Avatar

M McGuinness 2 years ago

The modern design does not suit the environment at all.

Avatar

Michelle Jones3 years ago

I knew it was only a matter of time Statewood/Woodward would begin again. In no way at dies this blend itself into Fort Langley. This building is cold, ugly and lacking the charm of the Fort. Keep Fort Langley and it charm.

Avatar

Pamela jane D3 years ago

Typical…people move from the city because of the charm of a town, then change it into a city just like they left. So sad.

Avatar

Sharon Blythe3 years ago

Absolutely a TRUE fact !!!

Avatar

Mary Smethurst3 years ago

Leave Fort Langley alone. Please maintain it but don't change it. Simple.

Avatar

Maria M3 years ago

This design is not in harmony with the heritage look and feel of Fort Langley. They must come up with a design that shows love for what Fort Langley is, instead of trying to impose a new, cold look. It would be jarring and totally out of character.

Avatar

Karelle BROYLES3 years ago

Keep the design congruent with the existing buildings. I rarely enter the big brick building on the east side of the street, preferring the small entries and venues, window displays " of old" on the west side. I also love the old trees of the town. Having people looking down from their apartments makes me uncomfortable. Fort Langley is a premier destination with lots of crowds- quaint and historic looking. Please keep it that way.

Avatar

Elinor Hanschke3 years ago

Agree that this building needs to be redesigned with a heritage building face. It looks like glass fronted Lego blocks. It looks cold and unwelcoming

Avatar

Nancy W. 3 years ago

Nothing about this "cool" design fits in with the historic vibe of Fort Langley. NOTHING! With just a little imagination you could still have a two storey building with retail on the bottom and apartments on the 2nd floor that fit in with what is currently on the main street of Fort Langley. No imagination is shown in this design. There is nothing European about it. Four containers with glass ends is the best descriptions I read. UGLY! Whether Woodward has his company in a trust or not, in the end it is Woodward who will profit from these decisions. Hard to believe with his slate, there's not a thumb on the scale or at the very least a careful selection of like-minded individuals (by him) for his slate. We already know he doesn't tolerate "No!" well.

Avatar

arthur schrade3 years ago

Keep the modern designing developers out of here !

Avatar

Mary-Ellen Craig3 years ago

This design does not fit in with the feel of the village at all. What are they thinking??

Avatar

Sean Melia3 years ago

The words of Councilor Baillie are contradictory. The stated...."it brings an aspect that I think will complement the heritage of Fort Langley" and "Baillie imagined a future where Fort Langley was pedestrian-centric and more European". In what world is glass and steel a "heritage" component or European in design? I can't imagine people reflecting on what a "European" feel is being steel and glass. We go to Fort Langley often for is charm, character of the buildings and home town feel. Sure hope this slide down the slippery slope doesn't gain momentum. Being unique, has its own appeal.

Avatar

Andy Schildhorn3 years ago

I'm genuinely concerned about the consistent lack of public comment opportunities regarding new developments in Fort Langley. Not only this project but also the Glover Mary Church development did not provide avenues for public input.

Meanwhile, Mayor Woodward and his slate have continually praised themselves for being open to public comment. It's worth noting that in various parts of the Township of Langley, required or not, we have seen many such opportunities for community engagement. However, here in Fort Langley, it seems that these opportunities are conspicuously absent. Why is that?

Avatar

R Mer3 years ago

It seems to me the rationale here, and the fiscal imperative, is that a large, multistory building will always be more valuable than any smaller historic building. An investor, or developer, therefore can always pay more and drive up the apparent "value" of the older building - and therefore approving this plan will inevitably mean that every other historic smaller structure will face the same development and planning process - replacement by a larger modern building, cheaper to build and more profitable to a developer. If the District truly wishes to preserve it's historic character it has no option but to reject this plan. The developer will complain but he is free to take his money elsewhere - he would have gambled and lost the way any developer can. It looks like a nice plan - but wrong place, wrong time. Move on.

Avatar

Katherine Sharpe3 years ago

The "design rationale" is a snowjob. As much as I agree with some of what Mr. Woodward has championed, this is the wrong direction. The Coulter Berry building is a heavy imposing structure that could have had stepped back third level balconies to make the facade recede and open to the sky somewhat. This building is absolutely not in keeping with the charm of the town. Mr. Woodward was very astute to buy up much of the main street when the village was languishing, however he should at least honour the much loved, well established theme of the town he chose to dominate. Imagine doing this in Leavenworth Washington? When is the next election?

Avatar

Shelly L3 years ago

The main reason I visit -( and always take my visitors to visit) is because of the unique and quaint look of Fort Langley. It’s a place I just have to share with others - especially from other provinces. It’s going to be just like everywhere else so really won’t have a true reason to visit.

Avatar

Laurie Hoekstra3 years ago

Is this not a prime example of what happens when you have a slate headed by a developer? Sure looks like it to me.

Avatar

Sue Watkins3 years ago

Interesting to read "councillors supporting the new building echoed their desire to keep the current growth going" In my opinion it is the feel of the rural small village that is the attraction, by moving from that theme it runs the risk of ruining the very reason that Fort Langley is thriving. Once everything becomes too modern the appeal goes away as the place becomes just the same as everywhere else. Please don't ruin the appeal or vibe that Fort Langley has, please keep the historic look of Fort Langley after all there are not too many historic looking communities in Canada.

Avatar

Roy Tremblay3 years ago

This concept has no historical imagination at all. It would totally ruin the little downtown area, and set the stage for future disasters. It seems all too clear why the owner of the development got involved in politics. He has an agenda. Let's use our imagination and put our heads together and come up with a front that looks like it belongs in a town called "FORT" Langley. Lets see some charm, warmth, and old heritage. Not something that belongs in a commercial "Wall St. theme. Movie sets come here not to film small New York, they come to capture that time period when life was simpler. Let's try again please.

Avatar

Sigrid Singleton3 years ago

Would ruin the vibe of the town. One only has to look at historic towns in Ontario. The retention of the historic look is maintained even after natural disasters force a lot of new construction. Apparently that is not important here.

Avatar

Elf Trigg3 years ago

Agree!

Avatar

Brad Richert3 years ago

“Woodward transferred his assets to his foundation before his run for the mayor’s chair.“

Have you confirmed this? The property is still owned by Woodward.

Avatar

Mary-Ann Sprenger3 years ago

In my view, a building like this would ruin the vibe of a the historic appeal and look of downtown Fort Langley

Avatar

Lise B3 years ago

Agree !