With more droughts anticipated, Abbotsford and Mission are preparing to stiffen its summer water restrictions—and hand out more fines.

Chilliwack is also taking action—though residents will be on a slightly longer leash.

New problem / old problem

Summer water restrictions are nothing new in Abbotsford and Mission, which jointly operate a water system.

In 2011, Abbotsford’s officials and politicians predicted the city would soon run out of water if it didn’t spend hundreds of millions of dollars to tap into Stave Lake. But voters shot down the controversial plan to partner with a private operator in a referendum, forcing the city to make do with the water sources it already had. Mission’s politicians had already decided against the private-public Stave Lake project. So if the two cities were to get through each summer, residents and businesses would have to scale back their water use.

And they did. Water restrictions combined with an ambitious public education campaign worked: even as the population of the central Fraser Valley has expanded, annual water usage has mostly remained steady. But summers in the Fraser Valley are now have just half the rain as they did 30 years ago, and those climactic changes are expected to test the resilience of the two cities’ water system.

Abbotsford and Mission get most of their water from the mountains north of the Fraser. The system is augmented by a network of wells in Abbotsford. While the city is planning to build more wells to further tap the aquifer and accommodate future growth,that work will take years. And the dry summers are already here.

Last year was one of the driest years on record. Abbotsford and Mission’s water system proved up to the test, with water restrictions limiting usage and just enough spring rain to prevent a crisis.

But now Abbotsford and Mission are looking at further tightening annual restrictions to prepare for future droughts. The new rules would match those already in place to the west, in Langley and the rest of Metro Vancouver.

Each year, the first stage of water restrictions comes into effect on May 1, regardless of snowpack levels and other factors. Additional stages of restrictions are applied when water levels in Dickson Lake north of Mission drop below a certain point. (Last year, the second stage of restrictions was triggered on July 21 as a precaution because of the intense drought, even though lake levels were still at Stage 1 levels.)

In recent years, the first stage of restrictions has limited watering of lawns to two days a week. In the second stage, watering can only be done once a week. In both stages, sprinklers can be used to water flowers, trees, shrubs, and vegetable gardens. (You can see other current restrictions here.)

The proposed new restrictions would cut lawn-watering during the first, automatic stage of restrictions, to one day a week. During Stage 2 restrictions, watering lawns with sprinklers would be banned. (Watering with a hose, by hand, would still be allowed.) The new Stage 1 and Stage 2 restrictions would also limit sprinkler-watering of trees, shrubs and flowers (though not vegetables) to between 5 and 9am each morning. (Watering by hand or with automatic shut-off or drip systems would still be allowed.)

There would be other tweaks, including increased restrictions on golf courses and car washes. Golf courses would also face increased Stage 2 water restrictions, and be banned from watering fairways altogether in Stage 3.

Perhaps most notably, the cities will also issue fewer warnings before starting to fine rule-breakers.

The cities currently take a three-step approach when someone is found to be breaking a water rule. First they get a door hanger advising them they’ve been caught water-handed. If another violation is detected, they get a warning notice. It takes a third strike before a rule-breaker gets fined.

Last year in Abbotsford, 815 doorhangers were handed out and 38 warning letters distributed. No fines were issued at all.

Now city staff have recommended Abbotsford ditch the door-hanger element and skip straight to an educational warning letter. If a second violation is detected, a fine will be issued. Like the changes to the regulations, the two-strikes enforcement process also mimics rules in Metro Vancouver.

Abbotsford staff say stricter enforcement should lead to lower water demand.

Abbotsford council is set to vote on the proposed new restrictions at its council meeting later today. Mission’s council is expected to vote in May on a matching set of changes to its water restrictions.

Chilliwack

The City of Chilliwack also recently tweaked its rules to trigger water restrictions earlier each year.

Chilliwack’s first stage of restrictions will now begin at the start of May, rather than June. But how water can be used during various water restrictions stages isn’t changing.

Under the first stage of restrictions, residents will still be able to water their lawns twice a week in the morning or evenings. During the second stage, lawn sprinklers are allowed once a week during the early morning.

Chilliwack relies on a network of wells that tap the aquifer beneath the city. The aquifer is depleted through the summer, but tends to spring back over the rainy winter and spring. Recent years, though, have seen water levels begin to drop earlier and earlier in the year.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Marie Bercier2 years ago

There is plenty of warnings about climate change that will effect ALL OF US , so it is time to hit the misbehaviours in the pocket . Unfortunately some think they are exempt NO .

Avatar

John Viggiani2 years ago

Thank you.

Avatar

Dave Loewen2 years ago

Tyler is partially correct in identifying the solutions used in the years immediately following 2011 to counter water shortage, but I must add by suggesting the two most important factors were, 1/ the introduction of water meters in Abbotsford, and 2/ a recognition that a major cause of water shortages was an outdated distribution system that could not keep our reservoirs refilled during high usage. Addressing those two issues were the most effective measures taken in prolonging the period of time before a new water source was needed. That time has now arrived, contrary to what was believed for many years - that 2016 was the "drop dead" date, when water supply would be insufficient.

Avatar

Pat Maclou2 years ago

You say that Chilliwack has "seen water levels begin to drop earlier and earlier" in recent years. I wonder if this has any connection to inviting Molson/Coors to take millions of liters of water from the aquifer every year?

Avatar

John Glena2 years ago

As I drive around the rural area in Abbotsford I notice the farmers water their lawns during restrictions. What givers here. Are they pulling water up from an under ground source? Excuse me but that is my drinking water being wasted. We live around so much water in the mountains, lakes, rivers and we are still restricted.

Avatar

Kit Bourdon2 years ago

I disagree the approach of Chilliwack is continuing to take. We follow the watering restrictions and watch every summer our lawn go brown while our neighbours who have under ground sprinkles use them full time late at night or early mornings. They have lush green lawns. It is well know the City will not hand out fines. They don't have the staff and don't want staff to work adjusted hours to check or catch misuse of water. As well the City doesn't want staff to deal with conflicts with the watering public. Delta bylaws loves to hand out fines.

Avatar

Greg McKone2 years ago

The reduction and rain change to our climate, which is largely caused by burning fossil fuels. Causes us a cost to adapt to this new reality. When we look at Mission city and Abbotsford city, it’s difficult to see intentional work to stop climate change. While there might be a handful of electric vehicles and other token problems the cities keep pushing suburban development that is car centric sprawl focus on 1960s thinking is not serving us well. Buying methane buses instead of electric buses was shortsighted. The cities have done, almost nothing to influence the behaviour of the residents. Watch the cities behave reactively as the droughts continue to worsen asking the residents to bear the costs and inconveniences of their lack of planning. And more specifically their lack of fighting climate change.

Avatar

Laurie Hoekstra2 years ago

EVs aren't going to fix the climate change problem, at least not until we have enough "clean" electricity for all. Powerex sells BCs electricity to higher-paying customers, some of whom may not be allowed to use anything but "clean" energy (California, for instance) and then buys back cheaper - "dirty"- energy for BC needs. Theoretically, Powerex could be selling 100% of our "clean" energy and buying back only coal-generated electricity, making us a truly filthy entity. Plugging in more and more EVs here would only exacerbate our current reality. Realistically, we are probably not using only coal-generated power, but it still could be a significant amount of our total usage on any given day. We don't know, because Powerex is private. But that's our reality, and you don't know whether the power you're using is "clean" or "dirty" whenever you plug something in - more likely the latter.

Avatar

Greg McKone2 years ago

This isn’t a surprise. Both cities have had years and years to plan and prepare budgets to ensure proper water services to their citizens. Abbotsford made sure that it got a new ice hockey rink and other things instead of spending the money to improve water infrastructure

You mention a referendum and people like me definitely voted against that because it would’ve put the cities water in the hands of a private corporation it’s very dangerous to put the life behind a pay wall to add a profit layer on top of lights is a dangerous road. There is this fiction that private interests are cheaper than government interests. I’ve worked in the area of quality in government for approximately 20 years. It’s my observation that the highest prices and the lowest quality happen when private interests stand to profit.

If Abbotsford, and mission, were to run that referendum again, as a government owned an operated system, I would vote for it

Avatar

Christine Camilleri2 years ago

…and what restrictions is Molsons-Coors facing? If car washes, golf courses and residents must step up, which makes sense, then what about large companies that use enormous amounts of water to make their one and only product? I’d like to know. Is it another case of tax dollars trumps common sense? Just wondering.

Avatar

Skye Richards2 years ago

This is definitely something that people need to adjust their thinking and behaviours around. There is likely to be many water shortages even in North America, however this problem is much worse in some places and there is difficulty having enough or clean drinking water.