The provincial government has rejected the Chilliwack School District’s request for funding to expand Vedder Middle School and several others in the city. 📷 Grace Kennedy

No new schools for you.

The provincial government’s school building spree looks set to grind to a halt in the fast-growing Fraser Valley, with Victoria telling the region’s five school districts it won’t green-light new major projects this year.

Last year, the school districts submitted capital plans with a combined $1.5 billion of schools, sites, and expansions for which they hoped to receive funding. This spring, the province told the districts that there is no money for new schools in the valley.

In letters sent this spring to school boards in Langley, Chilliwack, Abbotsford, Mission, and the Agassiz-Hope area, the province blames school fires and a “challenging fiscal environment” for its inability to set money aside for new and expanded schools.

The lack of funds for new schools follows a decade of population growth in the Fraser Valley that has prompted the province to promise to increase school facilities in the region.

‘Emergent issues’

Every year, local school boards put together lists of new schools and other capital projects they hope the province will fund. Around 10 months later, Victoria writes letters to each district revealing which projects will receive money.

For each proposed project that receives funding, there are many that are left waiting for money in the coming years. But new and expanded schools were being regularly approved across the region. Last year, for instance, the province approved $153 million worth of new schools in Langley, where the school district had put together a list of projects worth nearly $700 million.

The province has moved to try to expedite the construction of additions by green-lighting modular additions that cost about $1.5 million for each new classroom. And construction and planning on new school projects continues for new schools in north Langley, Mission, and rural Chilliwack.

Last year, the Fraser Valley’s five school districts put together major capital plans with a combined $1.5 billion in requested new school projects. Those include site acquisitions, expansions, seismic stability upgrades, and entirely new schools.

Langley had the largest school wishlist, with more than $700 million in requested projects. Chilliwack had a list of projects worth a combined $330 million. And the Fraser-Cascade, Abbotsford, and Mission school districts each had between $150 million and $210 million worth of new school needs.

You can see each major capital plan here: Langley | Abbotsford | Mission | Chilliwack | Fraser-Cascade. You can see the response letter sent to the Abbotsford School District here.

None of the requested schools, sites, or expansions will receive funding, according to letters sent to the districts this spring. (The province has provided funding for a range of maintenance upgrades at various schools).

The letters sent to the school districts cited “a variety of emergent issues including a significant number of school fires and a challenging fiscal environment.” A handful of fires have damaged schools over the past year, and the province has also committed to rebuilding a Port Coquitlam school destroyed in 2023. But that “challenging fiscal environment” is likely the larger factor, with the letters sent in the spring at the height of uncertainty about the fiscal ramifications of American tariffs.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that new schools won’t continue to be built over the coming years. But capital allocation is the first step in a lengthy bureaucratic process that can take years to turn a promise for a new school into real classrooms, desks, and blackboards.

Mission was promised its new high school in the 2020 provincial election, but it took until the spring of 2023 for the province to approve the school district’s capital request. A business plan was approved in 2024, but officials don’t expect construction to wrap up on the new school until 2029.

The Current asked the province it it had approved new major capital projects in any school districts this year.

In a lengthy emailed response that didn’t answer the question, the spokesperson wrote that “only after a business case is approved can funding be confirmed and announced.”

That would be new: in 2023, the province held a press conference to announce funding had been allocated to replace Mission Secondary School. A business plan was only completed the following spring, at which point the province issued another press release. The ministry said it had approved 10 major school projects, including the Mission high school, “since last year.” Those had a combined value of $1.1 billion.

The ministry response said year-over-year comparisons don’t “reflect the progress of school capital planning” and pointed to its 2025 budget, which allocates $4.6 billion to schools over the next three years. The ministry said “We look forward to announcing more school capital funding in the coming months.”

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

James Visscher1 year ago

The Vancouver school district should be forced to sell some of its unused assets (over a billion dollars) and the funds should go to districts that are growing.

Avatar

Mark Schmit1 year ago

One can look to the recent salary report released by the City of Surrey to find some answers. Take the city manager Rob Costanzo, from 2023 to 2025 his base salary has increased from 318,257 to 391,000 almost a full 24% increase in 2 years. Who these days gets 12% per year increase. Our governments are completely out of control when it comes to financing and those of us paying the bills need to stand up and tell them they need to get it under control.

Avatar

Nisha Foerstner1 year ago

Hello There I just got my property tax notice. I was shocked to see 30% of my taxes go to schools! We’ve paid it for years with no school-aged children for 20, except grandchildren not in the region.

So, why are we short? Are we allocating well? Are administrations costs above 3-5%? (France keeps admin cost to 2% and has one of the best educations in world).

Can you investigate that? Or, show me where to look and I can send you a rough article to edit…

Love FV News! You rock! 🎸

Avatar

Rick Bomhof 1 year ago

The province imposes a school site development cost charge (DCC) on all new developments in the province. My understanding is that this charge has not increased for many years. Since a major reason for school growth is caused by new developments it stands to reason that they should fund a significant portion of new schools. I even think there are limitations for what the DCCs can be used for such as land only. More schools could be built if this charge were increased considerably and its use broadened to actually pay for construction costs. You may say that will increase housing costs but in my mind the market will bear what it can regardless of costs, I.e., a developer will charge the highest value based on the market. I believe DCCs will cause developers to pay less for raw land which is reasonable.

Avatar

Elwira Rosiak1 year ago

In Kamloops Thompson, we have school site acquisition charge (SSAC). Is that what you're referring to? It's for land only. Not the construction portion of the build. Recently, the school board consulted with the public on increasing those charges. They then informed the city about it. At least that's how I recall it happening. Our school board then reduced the SSAC to $zero because our enrolment projections flattened. Even though the projections didn't decrease in the city. We're a rural-urban district and we're under capacity in those rural schools.