A Tesla driver was sent flying last year when an arc-flash explosion occurred at an electric vehicle (EV) charging station in Hope—and the fault appears to have mainly been caused by the station’s electricity system. 

A report from Technical Safety B.C. (TSBC), released this week, found that a combination of errors occurred leading up to the explosion.

The driver was using a non-Tesla charging station in Hope with a third-party charging adapter that had been used approximately 50 times prior. But the adapter wasn’t approved for use in Canada and hadn’t been tested for use here. At the time of manufacturing the adapter, there was no approved standard in Canada, making the testing impossible, says the report.

But the adapter wasn’t solely to blame, says TSBC—prior errors at the charging station occurred before the explosion. As the driver began to charge his car, a short circuit in the station caused “abnormal voltage” to be sent through the adapter, which then “experienced an internal arc fault and explosion which damaged the adapter and vehicle,” according to the TSBC report. 

The vehicle and the charging station were significantly burned and the adapter was destroyed. In a video released by TSBC, the driver can be seen standing directly in front of the explosion. He only came away with minor scrapes and abrasions after being knocked over by the arc-flash.

A2Z, the company that creates the adapter, said in a statement that its internal investigation found the fault was mainly tied to issues with the charging station in Hope.

The short circuit caused an electrical current to flow through the ground conductor, which is not designed for continuous voltage “where there should be none.” Normally, charging stations would shut down if this occurs, but the Hope station didn’t.

“The adapter simply became part of the fault path; it did not cause or sustain the current,” the A2Z release reads. “Under safety standards, the charging station should have instantly detected and interrupted that fault.

“Under normal operating conditions, this event would never have occurred.”

A2Z says that the charging-station operator has since conducted a review of its systems and has made adjustments to prevent another explosive accident. The company says no faults were found with its adapter in its review. 

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Greg McKone1 year ago

I think it’s important that the charger company be identified in the interest of public safety. We should know. It’s clear it was not Tesla from the article.

This is an interesting article because Evie’s are newer, and the idea of electrical explosions is a very unfamiliar concept
Would this article benefit from comparing the safety of chargers with the safety of gas pumps how many incidents per year per pump?

The article is not making any unfair claims and I love context

Avatar

Laura Munn1 year ago

Which charging station was involved. There are several in Hope, and I have used several there. That information is not included

Avatar

Tim Lollar1 year ago

There’s lots of Tesla chargers in Hope.

Avatar

Laura Munn1 year ago

But none are downtown.

Avatar

Mimi N1 year ago

The adapter testing seems like a nuanced point. The article says it wasn't tested or approved but also mentions that there wasn't testing available at time of manufacture. So is it old or CSA just hasn't caught up? Would testing actually have prevented the fire?

Avatar

Neil Hotvedt1 year ago

Except the adapter was not CSA approved.