- Fraser Valley Current
- Posts
- What a disagreement about hockey says about the power of a BC mayor
What a disagreement about hockey says about the power of a BC mayor
Chilliwack's mayor was forced to backpedal after suggesting he would prefer the city's BC Hockey League team remain in town.

The City of Chilliwack will soon take ownership of the Chilliwack Coliseum after a closed-door council vote. đˇ City of Chilliwack/Facebook
This story first appeared in the April 3, 2025, edition of the Fraser Valley Current newsletter. Subscribe for free to get Fraser Valley news in your email every weekday morning.
Consider it two minutes for speaking oneâs mind.
Chilliwack Mayor Ken Popove found himself in his councilâs metaphorical penalty box last week for being too candid with his thoughts on the future of junior hockey in his city.
After admitting in a radio interview that he would rather the Western Hockey League not return to his city, Popove quickly backtracked, issuing a press release saying âWe are excited that the WHL has selected Chilliwack for expansionâ and apologizing if his earlier comments had offended anyone.
It seemed Popove had quickly flip-flopped on Chilliwackâs junior hockey question, but it wasnât entirely that simple. Instead, the episode provided a rare glimpse into behind-the-scenes decisions, the limitations on mayoral power in BC, and why some councils fall into acrimony while others seem impossibly harmonious
You canât keep politics out of sports, even when it comes to Canadian junior hockey.
Two decades ago, in 2002, the City of Chilliwack contracted the Chiefs Development Group, the owner of the local junior hockey team, to build and operate its new 5,000-seat multi-purpose arena. Originally named Prospera Centre thanks to a now-lapsed sponsorship deal, the facility is now called the Chilliwack Coliseum. The arena has been the home of the British Columbia Hockey Leagueâs Chilliwack Chiefs since 2011. The facility has two ice sheets and also hosts minor and adult hockey games, and various community events.
CDG has owned the arena since its construction, but last week the City of Chilliwack announced it was taking back ownership of the facility and would spend millions on various upgrades. CDG will operate the Coliseum for one more year before it returns to the cityâs control in 2026. Days later, the Western Hockey League announced it was soliciting bids for a new junior hockey team in Chilliwack. It held a press conference on March 25 to celebrate its return to the city. The twin announcements were clearly connected: the cityâat the behest of its councilâhad specifically taken control of the arena to facilitate the return of the WHL to Chilliwack.
But the history of junior hockey in Chilliwack makes such a move more emotionally fraught than it might be in other communities.
That recent history is very complicatedâyou can find an explainer at the bottom of this story. There are two key facts: the WHL is seen as bigger and better than the BCHL, and some Chilliwack hockey fans have pre-existing loyalties toward the Chilliwack Chiefs and harbour a lingering distaste for the WHL due to the departure of the Chilliwack Bruins, a team that played in the city between 2006 and 2011.
Popove didnât attend the press conference announcing the return of the WHL last Tuesday. Two days later, he appeared on a weekly radio segment on JRFM and said he chose not to go. He said council had made a decision about whether to facilitate the return of the WHL and that he didnât think it was âthe right move.â
And although Popove didnât bash the WHLâhe described his feelings as being borne out of loyalty to the Chiefs, their staff, and their presence in the communityâhis words quickly got Popove into trouble.
Later that same day, the City of Chilliwack distributed a press release with a statement from Popove. The statement began: âI recently shared a personal opinion on our local radio station, and acknowledge that my comments may have been misinterpreted as the opinion of Council.â
It continued, saying with Popove writing that he didnât mean to disrespect the WHL by not attending the press conference, and apologized if it had been taken in that manner.
Popove concluded the statement by writing that âCouncil made a decision that serves the best interest of our community. We are excited that the WHL has selected Chilliwack for expansion and look forward to taking the next steps together in order to welcome a new team to our incredible community.â
Popove, of course, hadnât seemed excited just a few hours before issuing the statement. But then again, in his final statement, Popove wasnât actually speaking for himself.
The mayoral megaphone
On its face, Popoveâs pro-WHL written statement seemed to contradict his pro-BCHL stance from just a few hours earlier. Certainly, Popoveâs council colleagues and the WHL might be fine if it was interpreted as a show of full support for the return of major junior hockey.
But thatâs not quite what he said. When Popove wrote âWe are excited that the WHL has selected Chilliwack for expansion,â he was performing one of the core duties of his job: he was speaking for council, not himself. That was underscored by the use of âwe areâ rather than âI am.â
Usually, a mayorâs opinion broadly aligns with the majority of council: after all, the same voters who elected a mayor elected the council. So when a mayor speaks for council, often he or she can speak from their own personal perspective.
But sometimes, thereâs a clash between council and mayor. And that can thrust a mayor into an awkward position. Provincial law gives mayors certain responsibilities and abilities, but some of their duties are delegated through city policies that are approved by council. Usually those duties include the role as the cityâs primary spokesperson in media interviews and public appearances. As spokesperson, the mayor is supposed to embody the collective voice of council.
That is relatively simple when a mayor agrees with a council decision, but much more complicated in the event of disagreement. Itâs particularly awkward when the decisions are made in closed-doors meetings, in which the disagreement is not already obvious.
When a mayor is in the minority of council on a public vote and their opposition is a matter of public record, he or she can explain that âcouncil has decidedâ to do something and let their past statements speak for themselves.
But Chilliwack councilâs vote to sever its links to the Chilliwack Chiefs took place during an in-camera meeting from which the public was barred. That is not an unusual occurrence. Decisions about legal contractsâalong with land and labour issuesâtypically take place behind closed doors for both privacy and financial reasons. (Some say too much business takes place in such âin cameraâ meetings in BC.) But not only does the public not know the full breadth of topics addressed during in-camera meetings, when in-camera issues do become public knowledge, they arrive as completed decisions. Even when the topic becomes public, there is no record of how individual councillors voted.
This situation can prompt confusion when, as was the case last week, a mayor must proclaim councilâs support for an in-camera decision he or she opposed.
Usually disagreements are hammered out in private or set aside in the interest of getting on with city business. Prolonged conflicts are rare because most mayors realize that they need allies on council to get things done.
But whether mayor-council conflicts occur during in camera meetings or in full view of the public, there is always a risk of it disrupting a cityâs ability to do business. When a mayor is dismissive of councilâs power, or unable to subjugate their own opinions to that of council, they can end up having their mayoral microphone taken away.
That is what has happened in Kamloops, where the cityâs mayor has been pitted against its council since the 2022 election. Last year, council voted to remove mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson as the cityâs spokesperson after an advisor appointed by the province (former Abbotsford mayor Henry Braun) found the mayor was largely to blame for two years of council dysfunction.
The removal of Reid-Jackson as spokesperson was another illustration of where power lies in BC municipal politics. A mayor chairs council meetings, but has just one vote. If he or she has few or no allies, a mayor canât do much. While their duty chairing meetings is dictated by provincial rules, many other powersâlike that of city spokespersonâare the result of policies previously created by council. As a council grants certain responsibilities, it can also take them away.
Rarely, though, does it need to do so.
Popoveâs statement last Thursday illustrated what normally happens when a mayor disagrees with his or her council: usually fences are mendedâat least in public.
âCouncil is remarkable in that we can respectfully disagree with one another while remaining committed to the democratic process,â Popove wrote. âWe are dedicated to serving the best interests of Chilliwack and moving forward together once a decision has been made.â
A mayor on the losing side of a vote typically has little benefit to gain from digging in their heels if they want to rally support for future priorities. But the statement also wasnât out of character for Popove. Since he took the mayorâs seat in 2018, council clashes have been rare, and Popove has generally struck a positive tone both at public events and during meetings. Thatâs typical of most BC councils.
Still, the disagreement over the future of junior hockey in Chilliwack revealed policy differences that the public rarely seesâand potentially a sign of a future political split.
Because the vote on the future of the Chilliwack Coliseum occurred in a closed-door council meeting, there is no public record of whether Popove was a lone dissenter or had others unenthusiastic about the return of the WHL. In an email, a city spokesperson said votes on in-camera matters are subject to confidentiality rules set out in the provincial Community Charter.
Although Chilliwackâs councilâlike those in Mission and Abbotsfordâusually votes unanimously to approve items in public, itâs impossible to know the frequency (and intensity) of disagreements behind closed doors.
Chilliwackâs council has largely seen its politicians moving in the same direction. But next fall could bring policy differences into the open.
Longtime Coun. Jason Lum has said his current term will be his last as councillor, but he hasnât ruled out a run for the mayorâs chair. The four-term council has led the polls the last two elections, and many believe he may run for mayor next year.
Popove, meanwhile, hasnât declared his intentions. Both politicians told The Current they havenât made any decisions yet. By the time voters head to the polls in 2026, a new junior hockey team will be playing in Chilliwack and other topics will likely occupy the political discourse.
The next city mayor-spokesperson could be an enthusiastic backer of the new teamâor not. But theyâll need to keep in mind the fact that their mayoral megaphone has an off/on switch controlled by their council colleaguesâand opponents.
Reply